South African municipal audit outcomes

In the 2023/24 financial year, 41 of 247 audited municipalities received an unqualified opinion with no findings, as National Treasury records it, and 107 received a qualified, adverse or disclaimer opinion.

Data as of
2026-10-21 (8 days ago)
Sources
Source: National Treasury, Municipal Money (municipaldata.treasury.gov.za); data as published on 2026-10-21. Not endorsed by National Treasury. (PROPRIETARY)
Refreshed
every 30 days

Treasury's Municipal Money publishes one municipality's audit outcome for one year at a time. This page puts every municipality's outcome side by side, trended year over year and broken down by province, so the pattern is visible in one look.

Outcomes by financial year

Each bar is one financial year's audited municipalities, split by the Auditor-General's opinion. Modified combines qualified, adverse and disclaimer opinions. 10 municipalities had no opinion by the data date for 2023/24, and are left out of the bars.

Share of audited municipalities by audit outcome
No findingsEmphasis of matterModified
2010/112011/122012/132013/142014/152015/162016/172017/182018/192019/202020/212021/222022/232023/24020406080100Share (%) →2010/11: No findings 13 (5%)2010/11: Emphasis of matter 116 (42%)2010/11: Modified 146 (53%)2011/12: No findings 9 (4%)2011/12: Emphasis of matter 107 (42%)2011/12: Modified 141 (55%)2012/13: No findings 22 (8%)2012/13: Emphasis of matter 99 (36%)2012/13: Modified 157 (56%)2013/14: No findings 40 (14%)2013/14: Emphasis of matter 109 (39%)2013/14: Modified 129 (46%)2014/15: No findings 54 (19%)2014/15: Emphasis of matter 111 (40%)2014/15: Modified 112 (40%)2015/16: No findings 48 (20%)2015/16: Emphasis of matter 110 (45%)2015/16: Modified 85 (35%)2016/17: No findings 33 (13%)2016/17: Emphasis of matter 114 (45%)2016/17: Modified 108 (42%)2017/18: No findings 18 (7%)2017/18: Emphasis of matter 105 (42%)2017/18: Modified 130 (51%)2018/19: No findings 20 (9%)2018/19: Emphasis of matter 91 (40%)2018/19: Modified 118 (52%)2019/20: No findings 32 (13%)2019/20: Emphasis of matter 96 (38%)2019/20: Modified 128 (50%)2020/21: No findings 40 (17%)2020/21: Emphasis of matter 100 (43%)2020/21: Modified 93 (40%)2021/22: No findings 38 (15%)2021/22: Emphasis of matter 105 (41%)2021/22: Modified 112 (44%)2022/23: No findings 34 (14%)2022/23: Emphasis of matter 110 (45%)2022/23: Modified 103 (42%)2023/24: No findings 41 (17%)2023/24: Emphasis of matter 99 (40%)2023/24: Modified 107 (43%)
Municipalities by audit outcome and financial year
Financial yearNo findingsEmphasis of matterQualifiedAdverseDisclaimerOutstanding
2010/1113116559822
2011/1291076437421
2012/132299829660
2013/1440109713550
2014/1554111764321
2015/1648110604210
2016/1733114716312
2017/18181058712314
2018/1920918323328
2019/203296877341
2020/21401007141824
2021/2238105846222
2022/23341108561210
2023/2441999061110

By province, financial year 2023/24

Audit outcomes by province
ProvinceAuditedNo findingsEmphasis of matterModified
Eastern Cape3961419
Free State170611
Gauteng11263
KwaZulu-Natal5373610
Limpopo2721411
Mpumalanga19289
North West210318
Northern Cape302622
Western Cape302064

Method

  • One opinion per municipality per financial year, as National Treasury's Municipal Money records it. Municipalities are named and coded as in Treasury's own municipality register.
  • The categories are National Treasury's, as Municipal Money records each opinion: no findings is "Unqualified - No findings", emphasis of matter is "Unqualified - Emphasis of Matter items", and modified is qualified, adverse or disclaimer.
  • These are not the Auditor-General's "clean audit", which also requires no material findings on compliance and on the performance report. The Auditor-General's own count of clean audits can therefore be lower than the no-findings count here, and its count of outstanding audits can differ because the two are captured on different dates.
  • Municipalities with no opinion yet ("outstanding") are counted in the table and left out of the shares.
  • No boundaries or maps: this page uses no Municipal Demarcation Board data.

Built on the Cernitex API

The figures on this page come from these routes. They are in early access: write to hello@cernitex.com to request access.

Corrections

This page states what the public record says about named organisations. If you believe a statement is wrong, write to hello@cernitex.com with the record that shows it. We re-examine the page and note any correction here, with its date.

Changelog

  • 2026-10-21: snapshot of 3688 audit opinions, 2010/11 to 2023/24.